Lessons from the Sanctuary
To truly understand the
earthly sanctuary we need to first understand the reason for its
existence. Meaning: why did God decide
to “let
them make me a sanctuary?” The verse
gives the answer, “…
that I may dwell among them: (Exodus 25:8). It has always been God’s desire to dwell
among His created beings. To say that
the Sanctuary is a teaching tool, and ignoring the fact that God wanted to
dwell among Israel, is to miss the point that God is love. To say that the sanctuary was the way in
which the people could reach out to God is missing the point that it was God
who asked Moses to build it; in other words, it was actually God’s way of
reaching out to Israel.
Even before this sanctuary was built, Christ
lived among the angels as an angel. God
had met with Adam and Eve in the garden.
Enoch walked with God. And, God met
with Abraham face to face.
Let’s take a closer look on Enoch: Enoch
learned without the sanctuary about God.
Among the antediluvians was one young man who “walked with God” (Gen.
5:24). God took Him by the hand and Enoch went for a walk with God. “By faith”
Enoch bore a “testimony” to his generation “that he pleased God” (Heb. 11:5).
Enoch did not resist God and permitted Him to purify his life of sin and thus
God was able to reveal the deeper meaning of the sanctuary truth and cleanse
him of all known and unknown sin so that “he should not see death; and was not
found, because God had translated him.” Here was one person before the Flood
who comprehended the “the breadth, and length, and depth, and height” of “the
love of Christ, ... filled with all the fulness of God” (Eph. 3:18, 19).
Abraham learned the Gospel from God himself,
without the sanctuary. God’s everlasting
covenant given to Abraham pointed him to the heavenly sanctuary for salvation
and he believed the promise. Specifically Abraham believed in the gospel of Christ
as God proclaimed it to him. [Galatians 3: 8] The Sacrifice for sinners was so
vividly proclaimed by God to Abraham that when asked to “sacrifice” his son
Isaac on the altar, he was motivated by Divine love to give his only true son.
[Heb. 11:17, 18] The source of agape is the heavenly sanctuary (Early Writings,
p. 55). When God evangelized Abraham with the gospel it was thorough and
complete (Galatians 3: 14; Romans 5: 5). He revealed to Abraham what was in
heaven, the sanctuary, so that he could share with God as much as a human
could, the sacrificial love of God.
This demonstrates that there was no
necessity for an earthly sanctuary for a large part of earth’s history. For
some 2,200 years, from creation until Mt. Sinai, there was no earthly sanctuary,
but there was a real Temple residence for God in heaven. It was not until Israel made their old
covenant promise, “all that the Lord hath spoken, will we do” (Ex. 19:8) that
out of necessity God initiated the construction of an earthly tabernacle.
Motivated by their own self-sufficiency to obey the commandments, ancient Israel
made their vain pledge to keep their part of the bargain and that was the old covenant. God never asked them to promise him anything.
He simply proclaimed the good news promise to them as he had done with their
father Abraham. The only appropriate response would have been for them to
believe God’s promise just as Abraham did.
Then God’s Divine love would have been written in their souls.
But their self-confident pledge was the
great sin of unbelief. Paul writes: “Wherefore then serveth the law? It was
added because of transgressions” (Gal. 3:19). The root cause of
“transgressions” is unbelief. Evidently there was a great sin committed by Israel
at Mt. Sinai which necessitated the emphasizing of the law of God in the format
of the Ten Commandments written by God’s own finger on tables of stone. Since
the people would not simply believe God’s promise so that He might write His
laws in their hearts and minds, He was obliged to write them on rocks which
were placed in a box, the Ark of the Covenant, which was put in the tabernacle.
God wanted to abide in their lives, but through
unbelief they sent Him to dwell in a “motel room.”
Now what God would have taught them
Himself, as He taught Enoch, Abraham and Moses, He taught through the sanctuary
and its services. Did they learn? Some did.
And, we should point out that according to Ellen White it was through
the sanctuary service that Christ learned about Himself as the paschal
lamb. And, so now we are to learn about
the plan of redemption through learning about the sanctuary and its services. It was through understanding the earthly
sanctuary that we learn about what is happening in the heavenly one.
The actual structure is full of
meaning. Nothing was left to
chance. Everything from the hooks to the
curtains, from the cups to the Ark of the Covenant, the materials used and the
colors are reference to Christ and the plan of redemption. There too many details to discuss here. Suffice it to say, one more time: they are
all a reference to Christ and the plan of redemption.
In Psalm 27:4, David boldly identifies
his single-minded goal in life, his one great request: “One thing I ask of the
Lord, this is what I seek, that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the
days of my life” (NIV). The “house of the Lord” is another term for the sanctuary.
David’s single-minded quest was focused upon the sanctuary! In Psalm 27, he
summarizes the threefold experience he wished to have in the sanctuary. Verse 4
gives two facets of this experience: “to behold the beauty of the Lord, and to
inquire [after truth] in his temple” (NKJV). (The Hebrew word translated as
“inquire,” baqar, refers to careful examination of evidence in order to
determine the truth of a matter.) Toward the end of the psalm (in the verse
exactly paralleling verse 4), David pinpoints the third aspect of the sanctuary
experience that he longs to have: “to see the goodness of the Lord” (vs. 13).
God institutes a series of services in
which the people would come to the Sanctuary to seek and inquire of God. Ellen White says,
“The typical service was the connecting
link between God and Israel. The sacrificial offerings were designed to
prefigure the sacrifice of Christ, and thus to preserve in the hearts of the
people an unwavering faith in the Redeemer to come. Hence, in order that the
Lord might accept their sacrifices, and continue His presence with them, and,
on the other hand, that the people might have a correct knowledge of the plan
of salvation, and a right understanding of their duty, it was of the utmost
importance that holiness of heart and purity of life, reverence for God, and
strict obedience to His requirements, should be maintained by all connected
with the sanctuary.”—Ellen G. White Comments, The SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 2,
p. 1010.
In Patriarchs and Prophets Ellen White
reiterates the same concept in different words,
“The most important part of the daily
ministration was the service performed in behalf of individuals. The repentant
sinner brought his offering to the door of the tabernacle, and, placing his hand
upon the victim’s head, confessed his sins, thus in figure transferring them
from himself to the innocent sacrifice. By his own hand the animal was then
slain, and the blood was carried by the priest into the holy place and
sprinkled before the veil, behind which was the ark containing the law that the
sinner had transgressed. By this ceremony the sin was, through the blood,
transferred in figure to the sanctuary.”—Ellen G. White, Patriarchs and
Prophets, p. 354.
If the Sin was transferred to the Sanctuary,
then the sinner no longer has it. The
sinner is freed from the Sin. The sinner
leaves the sanctuary with assurance of God’s love, grace and forgiveness. He leaves the sanctuary with a heartfelt
appreciation for what God has done for Him.
He leaves the sanctuary with God in his heart.
No comments:
Post a Comment